Re: [OT[UnOfficial Unsubscribe FAQ
On Sat, 3 Jan 2004 00:41:46 -0700,
"s. keeling" <email@example.com> wrote in message
> Incoming from Tim Connors:
> > Nano Nano <firstname.lastname@example.org> said on Fri, 2 Jan 2004
> > 20:38:32 -0800:
> > > On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 09:29:32PM -0700, s. keeling wrote:
> > > > That is just so full of s**t, I'm not sure where to begin. Name
> > > > a corporation that has the power to toss you into Gitmo for an
> > >
> > > Equifax
> > Adobe/Skylarov: Not US citizen. So charged and not given rights that
> Fibbies, aka US Gov't.
> > DMCA: Wouldn't exist if not for Corporations. Now they fuck you
> > directly up the butt, and you *will* end up in prison.
> Lawyers. Big whoop. I don't buy the crap their bosses peddle.
..you don't have to, to see yourself locked up.
Only takes a "judge" buying it. ;-)
> > s. keeling seems to have a short memory.
> While others have a severe case of wishful thinking. The government
> can shoot you, for crying out loud. Corporations can just piss you
> off. Where's your sense of proportion?!?
..legally speaking, of course, you are correct, then again there is
this "getting away with it" bit.
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
Scenarios always come in sets of three:
best case, worst case, and just in case.