[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [OT[UnOfficial Unsubscribe FAQ



On Sat, 3 Jan 2004 00:41:46 -0700, 
"s. keeling" <keeling@spots.ab.ca> wrote in message 
<20040103074146.GC4733@infidel.spots.ab.ca>:

> Incoming from Tim Connors:
> > Nano Nano <40101.nospam@comcast.net> said on Fri, 2 Jan 2004
> > 20:38:32 -0800:
> > > On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 09:29:32PM -0700, s. keeling wrote:
> > > > That is just so full of s**t, I'm not sure where to begin.  Name
> > > > a corporation that has the power to toss you into Gitmo for an
> > > 
> > > Equifax
> > 
> > Adobe/Skylarov: Not US citizen. So charged and not given rights that
> 
> Fibbies, aka US Gov't.
> 
> > DMCA: Wouldn't exist if not for Corporations. Now they fuck you
> > directly up the butt, and you *will* end up in prison.
> 
> Lawyers.  Big whoop.  I don't buy the crap their bosses peddle.

..you don't have to, to see yourself locked up.  
Only takes a "judge" buying it.  ;-)
 
> > s. keeling seems to have a short memory.
> 
> While others have a severe case of wishful thinking.  The government
> can shoot you, for crying out loud.  Corporations can just piss you
> off.  Where's your sense of proportion?!?

..legally speaking, of course, you are correct, then again there is
this "getting away with it" bit.

-- 
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
  Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
  best case, worst case, and just in case.




Reply to: