Re: Is Evolution available for net-installation
On Fri, Dec 26, 2003 at 11:46:40AM -0600, Brad Sims wrote:
> On Friday 26 December 2003 8:21 am, Uwe Dippel wrote:
> > Or try Thunderbird, nevertheless. Contrary to Evo, which depends on
> > half of the worldwide accessible libraries, Thunderbird is much more
> > lean.
>
> Of course Evolution depends on every library known to man (CVS
> versions required on 1/4 of them); it's a Gnome app isn't it. <g> (I
> am a KDE zealot, can't you tell <smirk>)
Bah. KDE isn't really all that much better; they just put all the
libraries into one massive lump instead of splitting them out. There
isn't much to choose between them on that front, really.
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
Reply to: