Re: Web server Partitions
hi ya andrew
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Andrew Malcolmson wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 17:12:08 +1300, Edward Murrell wrote:
>
> > The first thing I'd look at doing is moving the default webpage to a
> [ Edward's advice on partitioning the web server}
>
> I also have a server with 6 SCSI drives and a hardware RAID controller. It
> will be a web server initially but eventually will be a light-load
> database and shell server also. Should all the paritions be included
> into one RAID volume or is there any reason to put some partitions
> (/tmp? /?) on a non-RAID'ed drive?
that depends on your ability to re-assemble a broken/dead raid system
and still make it work after you fiddled with the broken raid
the answer also depends on what is the purpose of the raid system
- to protect against 1 disk failure or to increase disk
read/write thruputs
raid can break due to:
- (1) disk failures
- the silly system takes forever ( dayz ) to resync itself
- too many disks failures renders the entire raid useless
- data and system on same raid
- something goes bad, you lose both system and data
- whether you can boot off raid5 is a trick question
of how you built the kernel and a customized initrd
( no different than booting off scsi disks,
( you cant read the scsi disks till you boot a
( scsi-capable kernel -> fix initrd to solve the problem
- users will do anything and everything to break the system
in the name of convenience and better/faster/easier for "them"
ways around it
- system should be on raid-mirroring and data on raid5
system should be mirrored and than stripped ( better/easier )
or alternatively stripped and than mirrored
or the system can be on a non-raided disk and raid5 for data only
- have an 2nd system disk for backup and go live by
simply changing its ip# and hostname
( even simpler )
- i prefer to keep "system" separate from "user data" (diff disks)
there is no point to raiding /tmp ...
- if the system dies ... all temp data in /tmp wont matter
- swap is already "semi-raided" by the kernel
and if it dies... swap data is generally useless anyway
c ya
alvin
Reply to: