[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Can we tag [T]echnical posts?



on Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 09:04:20PM -0800, Nunya (31210.nospam@comcast.net) wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 08:24:46PM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> > 
> > Ignore them.
> > 
> > The threads on completely off-topic issues (previously:  rail, opium,
> > and currently media acccuracy) simply shouldn't be on d-u.  I've held my
> > tongue this time, but the primary participants are very close to hitting
> > my killfile.  Again:  there _is_ debian-curiosa.
> 
> I was one of the worst offenders but "brother I've seen the light." :-)
> I'm born again hard.
> 
> I have implemented killfile with a mutt macro and procmail (I'm killing 
> the "Linux for Consumers" thread so far).  How does scoring work in 
> mutt?

IMO:  poorly.  The major disadvantage is that only header values
(from, to, subject, etc.) are allowed.

<F1> for information, or /usr/share/doc/mutt/manual.txt.gz


Peace.

-- 
Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com>        http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
 What Part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?
    Bush/Cheney '04: Deja-voodoo all over again!

Attachment: pgpUMuuMvFJge.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: