Re: Gentoo compromised too

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Gentoo compromised too
From: Tom <tb.31123.nospam@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 13:19:23 -0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 20031204211923.GA1916@comcast.net>
Mail-followup-to: debian-user@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20031205051828.4bf40caf.davidpalmer@westnet.com.au>
References: <[🔎] 20031203202934.GA8333@comcast.net> <[🔎] 20031204164237.GB19558@shorty.ca> <[🔎] 20031204170916.GD2522@live> <[🔎] 87k75cfifd.fsf@toncho.dhh.gt.org> <[🔎] 20031205051828.4bf40caf.davidpalmer@westnet.com.au>

On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 05:18:28AM +0800, David Palmer. wrote:

> You watch, The GPL will be invalidated next.

I agree with this (unfortunately).  Has the ACLU ever expressed an 
opinion on Free software?

Reply to:

References:
- Gentoo compromised too
  - From: Tom <tb.31123.nospam@comcast.net>
- Re: Gentoo compromised too
  - From: ScruLoose <scruloose+debuser@eastlink.ca>
- Re: Gentoo compromised too
  - From: Florian Ernst <florian@uni-hd.de>
- Re: Gentoo compromised too
  - From: John Hasler <john@dhh.gt.org>
- Re: Gentoo compromised too
  - From: "David Palmer." <davidpalmer@westnet.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: APT::Default-Release doesn't seem to affect upgrades
Next by Date: Re: FHS and other things Mark should have read with comprehension (was Re: unchecked 31 times)
Previous by thread: Re: Gentoo compromised too
Next by thread: gpl - Re: Gentoo compromised too
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread