Re: spam -- but no received: heders?
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 11:23:57 +0100,
Kjetil Kjernsmo <kjetil@kjernsmo.net> wrote in message
<[🔎] 200311201123.57173.kjetil@kjernsmo.net>:
> On Thursday 20 November 2003 11:16, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> > Is there a way to turn this off, BTW? I find it somewhat annoying.
> > I'd prefer just having spam tagged as such, without the extensive
> > mods.
>
> Dunno, but if you turn to Exim4 + exiscan, like I've done, I have
> found no way to turn it back on... :-) I have found that rejecting
> spam at SMTP time has made my life easier, so I would recommend
> checking it out.
..I also saw (here in d-u?) a mention of using _strictly_by_the _RFC_
smtp checks with postfix, and it was adviced "if delivery to your box
fails, it is the senders fault, because you follow all the RFC rules.",
AFAIRI.
--
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
Scenarios always come in sets of three:
best case, worst case, and just in case.
Reply to: