just in case this hasn't been answered yet ...
on Wed, 22 Oct 2003 10:54:24PM -0500, Ron Johnson insinuated:
> On Wed, 2003-10-22 at 20:47, Erik Steffl wrote:
> > Nori Heikkinen wrote:
> > > on Sun, 19 Oct 2003 12:38:45PM -0700, Erik Steffl insinuated:
> > ...
> > >> of course, you can create various complex and ambiguous sentences in
> > >>english, the point is that you can take few forms of sentences and
> > >>have a working language (that's pretty much what BASIC (talking
> > >>about programming language) is).
> > >
> > > you can do that in both languages.
> >
> > let's say you have a function called isRed(x) (returns true if x is
> > red). Now how would you call this function in german? it would never be
> > in agreement with all possible x (grammatically). not sure if this is
> > the best example - perhaps in this case it would be acceptable to use
> > istRot, regardless of gender of x. point is you would run into problems
> > like this trying to use german, you would very rarely come up with
> > problems of this nature in english...
>
> Being a native speaker of American, I've always wondered
> - What is the purpose of "gender" in grammar/language?
purpose? none. it's just categories that certain words fall into.
> - Is it only the European/Latinate languages that have the gender
> concept?
nope -- swahili for one. the only languages that have just two
genders that *i* know about are the latinate languages, but that
doesn't mean there aren't more.
> - Why English doesn't have gender, since it's predecessor, German,
not to mention french,
> does have gender?
languages evolved, pure and simple. who's to say why this particular
feature got lost over the years?
</nori>
[1]
--
.~. nori @ sccs.swarthmore.edu
/V\ http://www.sccs.swarthmore.edu/~nori/jnl/
// \\ @ maenad.net
/( )\ www.maenad.net
^`~'^
get my (*new*) key here:
http://www.maenad.net/geek/gpg/7ede5499.asc
(please *remove* old key 11e031f1!)
Attachment:
pgpK62iSdLcEi.pgp
Description: PGP signature