Re: More on spam
> I don't see what you could do about it before it reaches you machine in
> that case.
> Whoever runs a (corporate?) mail server these days without a spam filter
> should be considered legally insane.
The server have an antispam runing but swen messages are not technically spam.
> Now that would be the poblem of the guy that doesn't filter the mail at the
> server.And unfortunately yours when you get your messages.
I refuse to believe that the normal way a mail server should work is been 99%
of the time handling spam. This is not a production server of a big companny,
the only reason for us to be reseving all this crap is because I suscribed to
this debian list, so I would say that it's a debian problem too.
> I don't think this is going to happen - unfortunately.