On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 10:29:01PM +0200, Magnus von Koeller wrote: Content-Description: signed data > On Wednesday 15 October 2003 18:53, Pigeon wrote: > > What about with gcc-2.95.4? > > How would that make any difference? Shouldn't such a kernel package be > pretty much self-contained, not depending on any binary interfaces or > stuff like that? > > Still, I'll try with gcc-2.95. Just thinking that if it was worth trying with 3.2 instead of 3.3, trying with 2.95 - which is what woody uses - would also be worthwhile, possibly more so. -- Pigeon Be kind to pigeons Get my GPG key here: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x21C61F7F
Attachment:
pgpQ84H2uMtiP.pgp
Description: PGP signature