[firstname.lastname@example.org: Re: 2nd try? fontconfig? autohinter? anyone?]
Okay, that's the second slipup in the Matrix :-). Why did Mutt and Nano
freak out on me?
----- Forwarded message from Tom <email@example.com> -----
From: Tom <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: Re: 2nd try? fontconfig? autohinter? anyone?
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 15:40:12 -0700
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20031011224012.GA6175@comcast.net>
On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 08:52:59AM -0400, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
> Tom wrote:
> >Since I didn't get an answer yet, I'll ask again:
> >(To anyone) Do you prefer fontconfig with the autohinter
> >or bytecode interpreter? I'm trying to decide how to
> >set it up.
> Just pick one. If you don't like it you can just
> dpkg-reconfigure fontconfig
> That present you with the various configuration options again (the
> same as when you first installed).
Well, then, I'll stick with the decision I made six months ago:
the autohinter looks worse than the bytecode interpreter.
You know, this is the first slipup in the Matrix I've experienced
since I switch to Linux. (I hope you get that: 9 months ago I was
a MS-employee. I mean to say: taboo subject about which we are
embaressed so we'll pretend it isn't worth discussing...
Less than complete intellectual forthrightness... Patent issue
we cannot overcome...)
Not that it's a big deal, just find the arbitriness curious...
Everything else is rational.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org
----- End forwarded message -----
The California Recall was like the British Prime Minister election.
It was a vote of No Confidence with a short election cycle.