On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 06:25:37PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 17:20, David Palmer. wrote: > > On Thu, 9 Oct 2003 08:19:17 -0400 > > Johann Koenig <explosive@att.net> wrote: > > > > > On Thursday October 9 at 11:29am > > > Edward Murrell <edward@murrell.co.nz> wrote: > > > > > > > If you need good 100mbps performance under load, you can't go wrong > > > > with Intel. The 3Com 3c905Bs I use in my workstations also seem to > > > > take anything I can throw at them (including trying to run Q3A > > > > X11/OpenGL over a network, just to see if I could ;). > > > > > > I picked up a 10 pack of 3Com 905B's on eBay for about $50 USD. I've > > > only used a couple so far, but they are my favorite. Work well, every > > > time. > > > -- > > This sounds like the best option so far, unfortunately I'm working > > on a 1Ghz Athlon, not intel, and the planned migration is to dual > > Opterons when the 64bit smp project matures. > > ??? What's wrong with the 3c905B? Why shouldn't it work with AMD > systems? Indeed. That family of NICs work fine on my Athlon. -- Pigeon Be kind to pigeons Get my GPG key here: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x21C61F7F
Attachment:
pgpfgWDTFpykv.pgp
Description: PGP signature