Re: Routing

[Kevin Buhr <buhr@telus.net>]

"Mark Maas" <mark@menem.mine.nu> writes:
> 
> This is what my table looked like:
> 
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags Metric Ref    Use
> Iface
> localnet        *               255.255.255.0   U     0      0        0 eth0
> 217.149.32.0    *               255.255.240.0   U     0      0        0 eth1
> default         217.149.34.113  0.0.0.0         UG    0      0        0 eth1
> default         192.168.8.4     0.0.0.0         UG    0      0        0 eth0
> 
> so what do I need to do?
> 
> Just keep: route add -net 192.168.3.0/24 eth0 ?
> 
> Thanks again.
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kevin Buhr" <buhr@telus.net>
> To: "Mark Maas" <mark@menem.mine.nu>
> Cc: <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
> Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 1:28 AM
> Subject: Re: Routing
> 
> 
> > Kevin Buhr <buhr@telus.net> writes:
> > >
> > >         route add -net 192.168.3.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 eth0
> >
> > Oh, and David Z Maze is probably correct.  Even if this works, it
> > probably isn't what you want to do anyway.
> >
> > When you only brought "eth0" up and were able to reach the
> > 192.168.3/24 and 10.1.0/24 networks, what did your routing table look
> > like?  If you had a 192.168.8.0/255.255.255.0 route to eth0 and a
> > default route to a specific gateway machine (say 192.168.8.1), then
> > packets to those other networks were going out via that gateway
> > machine and you want to duplicate that environment in your new
> > configuration.
> >
> > --
> > Kevin <buhr@telus.net>
> >
> >