Re: Routing

["Mark Maas" <mark@menem.mine.nu>]

Thank you Kevin,

This is what my table looked like:

Kernel IP routing table
Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags Metric Ref    Use
Iface
localnet        *               255.255.255.0   U     0      0        0 eth0
217.149.32.0    *               255.255.240.0   U     0      0        0 eth1
default         217.149.34.113  0.0.0.0         UG    0      0        0 eth1
default         192.168.8.4     0.0.0.0         UG    0      0        0 eth0

so what do I need to do?

Just keep: route add -net 192.168.3.0/24 eth0 ?

Thanks again.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kevin Buhr" <buhr@telus.net>
To: "Mark Maas" <mark@menem.mine.nu>
Cc: <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 1:28 AM
Subject: Re: Routing


> Kevin Buhr <buhr@telus.net> writes:
> >
> >         route add -net 192.168.3.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 eth0
>
> Oh, and David Z Maze is probably correct.  Even if this works, it
> probably isn't what you want to do anyway.
>
> When you only brought "eth0" up and were able to reach the
> 192.168.3/24 and 10.1.0/24 networks, what did your routing table look
> like?  If you had a 192.168.8.0/255.255.255.0 route to eth0 and a
> default route to a specific gateway machine (say 192.168.8.1), then
> packets to those other networks were going out via that gateway
> machine and you want to duplicate that environment in your new
> configuration.
>
> --
> Kevin <buhr@telus.net>
>
>