On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 06:54:48PM +0200, Yves Goergen wrote: > Sorry to come in here with my Outlook Express... (still looking for a > 'better' MUA for Win32) I can't provide a fully informational quoting > line at the top, I'll try my best. But every each and then, for some > mysterious reason, Outlook Express 6 just doesn't want to >-quote to > the lines. Then I certainly won't go and add them by myself. Then it's > just easier to become a 'top-poster', appreciated or not. When on windows I use gnus. It works just like on Debian. People always joke that emacs is it's own OS, but that's often a good thing. So I don't have to deal with that kind of retardation. > But I must say that I find those PGP signatures a bit irritating, I > must filter them out in my eyes everytime I see them. Anyway, is it > really so important to sign one's messages here? Why not even encrypt > them? (Damn, I forgot, that doesn't work.) But there already was a > thread on that, I think. (And did I already mention that OE shows > those other signed mails as attachments?) OE is broken when it comes to MIME. I recommend you change MUA's. I've tested: mozilla mail mozilla thunderbird (mozilla mail without the rest of mozilla) gnus And find that all are lightyears ahead of outlook express. Bijan -- Bijan Soleymani <bijan@psq.com> http://www.crasseux.com
Attachment:
pgpWQal2qLsH9.pgp
Description: PGP signature