[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

apt-listbugs output question... was Re: Is Gnome working in teesting?



On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 05:27:26PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 08:51:06AM -0700, Kenward Vaughan wrote:
> > Silly question, perhaps, but I'm very unfamiliar with how one monitors
> > whether a known problem still exists.
> 
> If it's filed in the bug tracking system, at the moment you just have to
> look at the bug every so often, although there's some work outstanding
> on letting you subscribe to bugs.
> 
> If it's not, then you just have to look every so often. In the case of
> GNOME, reading the debian-gtk-gnome mailing list would probably be your
> best bet, if you aren't prepared to keep a very close eye on the state
> of testing (which I try to do for other reasons).

Thanks, Colin.

I just played a bit with apt-listbugs, and it seems to be the quickest way
to update myself on this particular package. Trying 'apt-listbugs list
libc6' gave the same output as I see in an apt-get operation.

I've now also discovered request@bugs.debian.org ... good, fuller source to
follow apt-listbugs.

Another trivia question for someone out there--

I noted the following bug types.  Is the "pending upload" essentially a
fixed bug not in the dist yet?  Is "resolved" one which is fixed?  Or is it
different than "closed" ?

--------
grave bugs of libc6 (2.3.1-17 -> ) <outstanding>
...
grave bugs of libc6 (2.3.1-17 -> ) <pending upload>
...
critical bugs of libc6 (2.3.1-17 -> ) <resolved>
...
--------

TIA,

Kenward
-- 
In a completely rational society, the best of us would aspire to be 
_teachers_ and the rest of us would have to settle for something less, 
because passing civilization along from one generation to the next 
ought to be the highest honor and the highest responsibility anyone 
could have.     - Lee Iacocca



Reply to: