[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Traditional Install or Knoppix?



On Sun, 17 Aug 2003 08:52:49 -0500
Kent West <westk@acu.edu> wrote:

> Darryl Barlow wrote:
> 
> >I plan to install Debian unstable on another machine.  Whenever I
> >have done this in the past I have started with a Woody install from
> >cd followed by apt-get dist-upgrade which of course works well. 
> >However, is there any disadvantage to installing knoppix and then
> >using dist-upgrade?  Might save me some time and bandwidth.
> >
> >Any opinions welcome.
> >
> >regards,
> >
> >Darryl
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> Last I tried (about a year ago), the Knoppix install didn't allow you 
> any control over your partitioning. So if that's important to you . .
> . .
> 

That's changed in the most recent release. That's how I installed
debian, and have kept right on working my way into sarge.

-- 
Rodney D. Myers <rdmyers@pe.net>	Registered Linux User #96112
ICQ#:     AIM#:       YAHOO:
18002350  mailman452  mailman42_5

They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a 
little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
        Ben Franklin - 1759

Attachment: pgpmC79Ab9LEf.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: