On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 07:41:04PM -0400, Greg Folkert wrote: > On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 18:14, Nathan E Norman wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 08:56:01AM -0400, Greg Folkert wrote: > > > knight:~# swapon -s > > > Filename Type Size Used Priority > > > /dev/rootvg/swap00lv partition 1048568 3140 -1 > > > /dev/rootvg/swap01lv partition 1048568 0 -2 > > > > > > Kinda makes no-sense to worry about it. > > > > Silly question: why aren't you mounting your swap with equal priority > > so they load balance? > > Because they are on the same disk... and I don't like swap "chunks" any > larger than 1GB. My rootvg only has /, /boot and swap on it. Other than > that, no reason. Now if it was on different IO channels... that'd be > different. That's a good reason! Sorry for the question then :^) -- Nathan Norman - Incanus Networking mailto:nnorman@incanus.net Q: What's tiny and yellow and very, very, dangerous? A: A canary with the super-user password.
Attachment:
pgp3hL3jgdo_4.pgp
Description: PGP signature