Also sprach Pigeon (Fri 08 Aug 02003 at 09:54:23PM +0100): > On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 11:10:47AM -0500, Michael D. Schleif wrote: > > I don't think that is it, since -- unless I'm terribly mistaken -- it > > appears that the whole process starts with an incoming mail message, > > with malformed headers, which is bounced. What confuses me is, where > > does this address: > > > > sophie.bourcier@wanadoo.fr > > > > come from? > > It's the reason I have *@wanadoo.fr in /etc/exim/blocked.senders: > knocks out stupid MS virus spams. That line just rejected another one > a few days ago, on my system. Yes, I understand that. However, I am trying to understand what is happening in my example bounce, because -- it looks to me as if -- this is a new type of malicious tool that bypasses normal anti-relaying configuration. Somehow, even though I am not an open relay, somebody sent mail to me that my system bounced, then relayed anyway . . . What am I missing? -- Best Regards, mds mds resource 877.596.8237 - Dare to fix things before they break . . . - Our capacity for understanding is inversely proportional to how much we think we know. The more I know, the more I know I don't know . . . --
Attachment:
pgp7x2pN8LMJ_.pgp
Description: PGP signature