Re: Moving /home to its own partition.
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 01:33:55AM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Aug 2003 09:04:18 +0100
> Colin Watson <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 07:53:23PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 04:35:48PM +0100, Pigeon wrote:
> > > > Note that:
> > > > rm -rf /home/* won't get rid of those pesky dot files
> > > > rm -rf /home/.* gets rid of a little bit too much...
> > >
> > > Doh! Yeah, you're right. Forgot that many tools ignore hidden files
> > > with no option to *not* ignore hidden files.
> > The option's certainly there, at least if bash is your shell. 'shopt -s
> > dotglob' (which won't cause * to include . and ..); 'shopt -u dotglob'
> > turns it back off.
> Wait, whoa, sorry I missed this earlier but why does someone think that rm
> -rf dir/* will miss . files?
Certainly dotfiles in subdirectories will be included.
> Unless those files are in /home. Why would there be . files in /home?
> Shouldn't /home only contain directories?
Well, indeed, although I have been known to have a /home/.system
directory in the past that contained stuff I'd moved from other
filesystems due to a lack of disk space in the right places.
Colin Watson [email@example.com]