Re: SCO, IBM, and cladistics
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, Paul Johnson wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 09:49:05AM -0400, Andrew Perrin wrote:
> > True enough - but in that case there's no use in identifying similarities
> > to begin with.
>
> Sure their is. Countersuit.
Touche!
ap
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Andrew J Perrin - http://www.unc.edu/~aperrin
Assistant Professor of Sociology, U of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
clists@perrin.socsci.unc.edu * andrew_perrin (at) unc.edu
Reply to:
- References:
- SCO, IBM, and cladistics
- From: "Andrew P. Porter" <app@jedp.com>
- Re: SCO, IBM, and cladistics
- From: Andrew Perrin <clists@perrin.socsci.unc.edu>
- Re: SCO, IBM, and cladistics
- From: Paul Johnson <baloo@ursine.ca>
- Re: SCO, IBM, and cladistics
- From: Andrew Perrin <clists@perrin.socsci.unc.edu>
- Re: SCO, IBM, and cladistics
- From: Paul Johnson <baloo@ursine.ca>