Re: SCO, IBM, and cladistics
On Thu, 2003-07-24 at 23:54, Paul Johnson wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 09:49:05AM -0400, Andrew Perrin wrote:
> > True enough - but in that case there's no use in identifying similarities
> > to begin with.
>
> Sure their is. Countersuit.
Good place to read up on the Whole thing:
http://sco.iwethey.org/
A lot of info. Almost too much to chew on.
Reply to:
- References:
- SCO, IBM, and cladistics
- From: "Andrew P. Porter" <app@jedp.com>
- Re: SCO, IBM, and cladistics
- From: Andrew Perrin <clists@perrin.socsci.unc.edu>
- Re: SCO, IBM, and cladistics
- From: Paul Johnson <baloo@ursine.ca>
- Re: SCO, IBM, and cladistics
- From: Andrew Perrin <clists@perrin.socsci.unc.edu>
- Re: SCO, IBM, and cladistics
- From: Paul Johnson <baloo@ursine.ca>