Re: Setting up eth0 - estrange behaviour on Woody
Shaul Karl
200.152.201.242 is my internet address which I alredy tested with a Window
98 machine.
below are the outputs ifconfig and ping:
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:00:21:CC:8D:65
inet addr:200.152.201.242 Bcast:200.152.201.241
Mask:255.255.255.248
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:6 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:12
collisions:102 txqueuelen:100
RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:588 (588.0 b)
Interrupt:10 Base address:0xde00
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:00:21:C8:C8:71
inet addr:10.1.1.49 Bcast:10.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:164 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:44 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
RX bytes:15607 (15.2 KiB) TX bytes:2944 (2.8 KiB)
Interrupt:11 Base address:0xdc00
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
RX packets:51 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:51 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:4163 (4.0 KiB) TX bytes:4163 (4.0 KiB)
################################################################
PING 200.152.201.247 (200.152.201.247): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 200.152.201.242: icmp_seq=0 ttl=255 time=0.4 ms
64 bytes from 200.152.201.242: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=0.1 ms
64 bytes from 200.152.201.242: icmp_seq=2 ttl=255 time=0.0 ms
64 bytes from 200.152.201.242: icmp_seq=3 ttl=255 time=0.1 ms
64 bytes from 200.152.201.242: icmp_seq=4 ttl=255 time=0.0 ms
64 bytes from 200.152.201.242: icmp_seq=5 ttl=255 time=0.1 ms
--- 200.152.201.247 ping statistics ---
6 packets transmitted, 6 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 0.0/0.1/0.4 ms
PING 200.152.201.242 (200.152.201.242): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 200.152.201.242: icmp_seq=0 ttl=255 time=0.2 ms
64 bytes from 200.152.201.242: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=0.0 ms
64 bytes from 200.152.201.242: icmp_seq=2 ttl=255 time=0.0 ms
64 bytes from 200.152.201.242: icmp_seq=3 ttl=255 time=0.0 ms
--- 200.152.201.242 ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 0.0/0.0/0.2 ms
PING 10.1.1.49 (10.1.1.49): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 10.1.1.49: icmp_seq=0 ttl=255 time=0.2 ms
64 bytes from 10.1.1.49: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=0.0 ms
64 bytes from 10.1.1.49: icmp_seq=2 ttl=255 time=0.0 ms
64 bytes from 10.1.1.49: icmp_seq=3 ttl=255 time=0.0 ms
64 bytes from 10.1.1.49: icmp_seq=4 ttl=255 time=0.0 ms
--- 10.1.1.49 ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 0.0/0.0/0.2 ms
PING 10.1.1.231 (10.1.1.231): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 10.1.1.231: icmp_seq=0 ttl=255 time=0.8 ms
64 bytes from 10.1.1.231: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=0.6 ms
64 bytes from 10.1.1.231: icmp_seq=2 ttl=255 time=0.6 ms
64 bytes from 10.1.1.231: icmp_seq=3 ttl=255 time=0.6 ms
--- 10.1.1.231 ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 0.6/0.6/0.8 ms
############################################################3
Reply to: