Re: Remove With Understanding Due Work, Power And Nature Of I Associative We
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 10:03:02AM -0400, Bill Marcum wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2003 at 12:34:02PM -0400, Mark L. Kahnt wrote:
> > On Fri, 2003-06-27 at 23:59, cr wrote:
> > > On Friday 27 June 2003 11:44, WBISOFIEEP@aol.com wrote:
> > > > LABOR TRUE SOLUTIONS WITH RESOLVE TOMORROW METABOLIC MIXTURE
> > > > THE TRADE WITH PEACE IS NOT CONSUMPTION CONTROVERSIAL DEALINGS
> > > > Datum technocratic fellowship, where concerning house of space abundant
> > > > truth may
> > >
> > > ... and so it goes on, for about 70K (well, that's what Kmail says) of
> > > incomprehensible gobbledygook.
> > >
> > > OK, so it's spam. What baffles me is how someone managed to
> produce such a
> > > volume of verbiage that appears to have some vaguely grammatical
> structure
> > > but is totally devoid of meaning. If any human wrote it, the guy
> should be
> > > in a rubber room.
> > > Makes a change from people trying to sell us Viagra, anyway. :(
> > >
> It could be the work of something like Megahal, which is available as a
> Debian package.
>
It looks to me kinda like the output of a "Travesty Generator". See
<http://runme.org/feature/read/+travesty/+49/> for a short description
and a link to some perl source. I remember having a fair amount of fun
with it after typing in the Pascal source from Byte almost 20 years
ago.
dt
--
Dave Thayer | If trees could scream, would we be so cavalier about
Denver, Colorado USA | cutting them down? We might, if they screamed all
dave@thayer-boyle.com | the time, for no good reason. - Jack Handey
Reply to: