Re: Very slow nfs client (woody) > server (woody)
On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 23:09, Mark Ferlatte wrote:
> Are you running portmap on the client and server?
Yes
> Are you sure that portmap knows about the NFS progs (what does pmap_dump tell
> you?)
It would seem so, as her is the output regarding on both the client and
server:
Client:
# pmap_dump
100000 2 tcp 111 portmapper
100000 2 udp 111 portmapper
100021 1 udp 32768 nlockmgr
100021 3 udp 32768 nlockmgr
100021 4 udp 32768 nlockmgr
100021 1 tcp 32769 nlockmgr
100021 3 tcp 32769 nlockmgr
100021 4 tcp 32769 nlockmgr
100007 2 udp 729 ypbind
100007 1 udp 729 ypbind
100007 2 tcp 732 ypbind
100007 1 tcp 732 ypbind
391002 1 tcp 32771 sgi_fam
391002 2 tcp 32771 sgi_fam
100024 1 udp 32772 status
100024 1 tcp 32788 status
Server:
#pmap_dump
100000 2 tcp 111 portmapper
100000 2 udp 111 portmapper
100003 2 udp 2049 nfs
100021 1 udp 32788 nlockmgr
100021 3 udp 32788 nlockmgr
100021 4 udp 32788 nlockmgr
100005 1 udp 32789 mountd
100005 1 tcp 32821 mountd
100005 2 udp 32789 mountd
100005 2 tcp 32821 mountd
100024 1 udp 32802 status
100024 1 tcp 32836 status
100004 2 udp 992 ypserv
100004 1 udp 992 ypserv
100004 2 tcp 995 ypserv
100004 1 tcp 995 ypserv
100007 2 udp 998 ypbind
100007 1 udp 998 ypbind
100007 2 tcp 1001 ypbind
100007 1 tcp 1001 ypbind
Yes I'm running it as a nis server as well, the only difference is that
the server is running nfs and mountd, these AFAIK are server related
only.
Mark
--
Please be aware that I do not read or reply to messages
with attachments in any proprietary format.
Please send attachments in any standards compliant format.
Proprietary format attachments are a major obstacle to the
broader adoption of GNU/Linux.
Remember: Competition is good for business; Proprietary denies choice..
Reply to: