[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: procmail: Segfault with autoreply rules



On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 07:04:43PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 12:37:02AM +0100, Pigeon wrote:
> > > This message was created automatically by mail delivery software (Exim).
> > >
> > > A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
> > > recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
> > >
> > >   pipe to |/usr/bin/procmail
> > >     generated by baloo@ursine.dyndns.org
> > >     Child process of address_pipe transport (running command "/usr/bin/procmail") was terminated by signal 11 (Segmentation fault)
> 
> Yeah...I figured it out on my own.  Though if you knew it was
> segfaulting, why'd you try posting to the list?  Not like I saw the
> original.  8:o)

As a means of leaving the error report somewhere where there is some,
if small, chance of you being able to read it, along with half an idea
that the segfaulting might be content-dependent, so that given the
volume of the list, if it wasn't segfaulting on list mail you might
not notice it segfaulting on other mail for some time. I would guess
that Karsten probably thought something vaguely similar... kinda
ironic what the cause actually was :-)

-- 
Pigeon

Be kind to pigeons
Get my GPG key here: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x21C61F7F

Attachment: pgpQaCr60tEzu.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: