On Mon, 2003-05-05 at 11:05, Rick Pasotto wrote: > On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 10:47:13AM -0400, Bruno Diniz de Paula wrote: > > It sould be created. Regarding the value, I suppose anything bigger than > > 16MB should be enough... If not, keep increasing the value. > > Uh, the values currently in use are 20, 70, and 90 as in 20listchanges, > 70debconf, and 90zope. I'm sorry, I thought you were talking about the parameter for Cache-Limit. In my case, I didn't create any file inside apt.conf.d, I just created the apt.conf from the scratch inside /etc/apt and inserted the below line there. > > > On Mon, 2003-05-05 at 10:14, Rick Pasotto wrote: > > > On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 08:29:32AM -0400, Bruno Diniz de Paula wrote: > > > > Hi Mark, > > > > > > > > add this line to your /etc/apt/apt.conf file: > > > > > > > > APT::Cache-Limit 25165824; > > > > > > > > Instead of 25165824 you could use any other value that is enough to > > > > store the cached packages of your system. > > > > > > This is at least the third answer to mention changing the > > > /etc/apt/apt.conf file. There is no such file on my system. What there > > > is, is an /etc/apt/apt.conf.d directory that has several files in it. > > > Should such a line be added to one of those files or should a new file > > > be created? If created what should the prefix number be? > > -- > "Economics is extremely useful as a form of employment for economists." > -- John Kenneth Galbraith > Rick Pasotto rick@niof.net http://www.niof.net -- Bruno Diniz de Paula <diniz@cs.rutgers.edu> Rutgers University
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part