[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Apt-Get woes



On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 10:47:13AM -0400, Bruno Diniz de Paula wrote:
> It sould be created. Regarding the value, I suppose anything bigger than
> 16MB should be enough... If not, keep increasing the value.

Uh, the values currently in use are 20, 70, and 90 as in 20listchanges,
70debconf, and 90zope.

> On Mon, 2003-05-05 at 10:14, Rick Pasotto wrote:
> > On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 08:29:32AM -0400, Bruno Diniz de Paula wrote:
> > > Hi Mark,
> > > 
> > > add this line to your /etc/apt/apt.conf file:
> > > 
> > > APT::Cache-Limit 25165824;
> > > 
> > > Instead of 25165824 you could use any other value that is enough to
> > > store the cached packages of your system.
> > 
> > This is at least the third answer to mention changing the
> > /etc/apt/apt.conf file. There is no such file on my system. What there
> > is, is an /etc/apt/apt.conf.d directory that has several files in it.
> > Should such a line be added to one of those files or should a new file
> > be created? If created what should the prefix number be?

-- 
"Economics is extremely useful as a form of employment for economists."
		-- John Kenneth Galbraith
    Rick Pasotto    rick@niof.net    http://www.niof.net



Reply to: