[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Upgraded my box, and suddenly my fonts have changed



On Fri, 2003-05-02 at 03:37, Thomas Krennwallner wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> On Fri May 02, 2003 at 02:44:52AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > Now, the fonts in Evo, GQview (a gtk app), XCDRoast, OpenOffice 1.0.3
> > (binaries from OO.org, not .debs), gnome-terminal are all *much*
> > larger, and in Mozilla the fonts are sometimes *tiny* and sometimes
> > have changed to a different family.
> > 
> > What happened, and how do I put it all back like it was????
> 
> Accourding to http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=141332
> the order of the search paths for fonts have changed in
> /etc/X11/fs/config.
> 
> I changed following line:
> 
> catalogue = /usr/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/CID/,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo/,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/misc/,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic/,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/
> 
> to
> 
> catalogue = /usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic/,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/misc/,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo/,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/CID/,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/
> 
> and all worked as expected.

Well, I don't run xfs, so that won't work.

However, I did notice that all of my FontPath records except
1 were removed from my /etc/X11/XF86Config-4.  Copying over
and old known-good XF86Config-4 fixed it.

-- 
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| Ron Johnson, Jr.     Home: ron.l.johnson@cox.net          |
| Jefferson, LA  USA   http://members.cox.net/ron.l.johnson |
|                                                           |
| An ad currently being run by the NEA (the US's biggest    |
| public school TEACHERS UNION) asks a teenager if he can   |
| find sodium and *chloride* in the periodic table of the   |
| elements.                                                 |
| And they wonder why people think public schools suck...   |
+-----------------------------------------------------------+



Reply to: