Re: Page size variations in cups
On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 12:56:32AM -0400, Kevin McKinley wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Apr 2003 03:22:29 +0100
> Pigeon <jah.pigeon@ukonline.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > Also, any ideas why the two Canon drivers should be about an order of
> > magnitude slower than the HP one? The Canon processes only take maybe
> > 2% CPU at most (Celeron 600), and the printer port hardware is the
> > same in both cases.
>
> I can only make the obvious point that the HP driver is a CUPS driver and
> the Canon drivers are not -- they're foomatic drivers.
Yeah, I know that :-) I just can't figure out what the machine is
actually doing to take so long, any more than I can understand why
different drivers which are all configured with the same dimensions
for A4 should print the same test page at different sizes.
Pigeon
Reply to: