On Wed, 9 Apr 2003 03:22:29 +0100 Pigeon <jah.pigeon@ukonline.co.uk> wrote: > Also, any ideas why the two Canon drivers should be about an order of > magnitude slower than the HP one? The Canon processes only take maybe > 2% CPU at most (Celeron 600), and the printer port hardware is the > same in both cases. I can only make the obvious point that the HP driver is a CUPS driver and the Canon drivers are not -- they're foomatic drivers. Kevin