Re: Official Exim 4 package
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 12:46:16PM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Nevermind that my "change X" or "rework X" is at the exact same level
> of the explanation you've given your solution. Difference is, it is
> already coded. I've thrown out several ideas.
>
> Modify the behavior of epoch.
> Include a new field to identify separate paths of the same package.
>
> Notice thats the same as yours:
>
> Add version number to some package names.
No it's not. Your suggestions either break existing functionality or
rely on a non-existent mechanism of unspecified/unsuggested design.
My suggestion uses existing functionality and is already in use by many
other packages. There's quite a bit of difference there.
--
Jamin W. Collins
Reply to: