Re: Spam filter reviews?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 12:28:17PM -0300, Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote:
> One thing I had to do to avoid missing important mail is to zero the
> scores for some tests:
> score RCVD_IN_SBL 0
I would leave this one at it's original score, since this one is an
automated BL and adds hosts that are currently spamming and removes
them in a timely manner when they stop (well under a week in the vast
majority of cases). I think SBL means "Spamcop BL" in this case.
I would also *strongly* recommend not sending tagged mail to
/dev/null, but rather a dropbox so you can check it and run nonspam
through spamassassin -k so the Bayesian filter can get it right next
time.
> I get important message from quite a few servers included in those lists
> (including one of the servers I manage). Sometimes it's not possible for
> the admin to remove it (as in my case). We have a DLS connection, and
> there's only ONE company which provides such service in my area.
> And guess what? Both home and busines users will get blacklisted IPs,
> because the company wasn't competent enough to interact with the
> blacklist owners and fix some issues.
Get your netblock delegated to you, then, and resolve it on your own.
- --
.''`. Baloo Ursidae <baloo@ursine.dyndns.org>
: :' : proud Debian admin and user
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fix a system
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+e+WuJ5vLSqVpK2kRAjARAKDCcioXfzVsg/cZElm3Xlf+E/BhOgCgqOg6
Lqurfmd1JqpyCgWTlOgJYes=
=F4FP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: