On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 12:41:27PM -0500, ScruLoose wrote: > On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 06:46:06PM +0200, Johan Ehnberg wrote: > > ALSA is horribly documented, if it's gonna be the next de facto standard > > they have to shape up... > > Absolutely right. After I *finally* got it to work, the sound is great; > but I found f*&%-all documentation for it. Only with the great help of a > few people on this list, and some google results from other mailing lists, > did I manage to get it going. Yeah, ALSA is fairly doc-less, but most of the problems people have had (or at least I did) were related to getting the damn thing to build properly. ALSA is part of the 2.5/2.6 kernel, so it'll be as easy to build as the OSS modules are now. Even so, I've found the alsa-source package, combined with kernel-package made it almost trivial to build the ALSA modules correctly. -- Rob Weir <rweir@ertius.org> http://ertius.org/
Attachment:
pgpsPQsQc_oQh.pgp
Description: PGP signature