[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ALSA conf



On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 06:46:06PM +0200, Johan Ehnberg wrote:
> Howdy!
> Does someone know what's wrong with my alsa? I installed the module 
> sources and all other important alsa packages.
> I compile my own kernel and use emu10k1 for sound. Now I just moved the 
> module away. Do I have to disable it in the kernel and recompile?
> Now I compiled ALSA "on top" of my current kernel.

Standard disclaimer:  I'm no sort of an expert.  If my information is
wrong, then I hope someone will correct me.

What I've read somewhere, and is hopefully accurate and current, is that
in order to make ALSA happy:
1)  You must have core sound support installed (in my case it's the module
'soundcore' but I suspect you could have it compiled-in).
2)  You must *not* have any other sound *drivers* installed.  So if the
driver you were using before was a module, unload it, if it was
compiled-in... I guess you'd have to recompile without it.
3)  Dunno if this is relevant to your case, but I'm using alsa from binary
debs, and it required me to upgrade to a 2.4 kernel.

And, umm, I doubt I need to mention it, but you do have your ALSA emu10k1.o
module compiled and in its appropriate place in the modules directory,
right?

> ALSA is horribly documented, if it's gonna be the next de facto standard 
> they have to shape up...

Absolutely right.  After I *finally* got it to work, the sound is great;
but I found f*&%-all documentation for it.  Only with the great help of a
few people on this list, and some google results from other mailing lists,
did I manage to get it going.

I still have no clue what the 'options' in /etc/alsa/modutils/ are for... I
just know that if I exclude them it works, but if I leave them in it
doesn't.

	HTH
	-Chris

Attachment: pgpCcltQtHDSM.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: