[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: libvorbis0a? in unstable



I've tried them and they work (so far) like a charm.
Many thanks, Brian. 
I hope they will go to unstable soon.
Vlada
On Sun, 2003-03-16 at 01:39, Cameron Hutchison wrote:
> Once upon a time Brian Nelson said...
> > Cameron Hutchison <camh+dl@xdna.net> writes:
> > 
> > > If this is true, could I create a meta-package, libvorbis0, that depends
> > > on libvorbis0a, libvorbisenc2 and libvorbisfile3? I would have to change
> > > libvorbis0a so that it no longer conflicts with libvorbis0, but that's
> > > easy to do from the source.
> > >
> > > So, what I'm planning to do is to "apt-get source libvorbis", update the
> > > versions to 1.0.0-3.0.1, modify the control file so 0a does not conflict
> > > or replace 0, add a libvorbis0 meta-package, build and install.
> > >
> > > Will this work? (well, I'm going to try it anyway, but any feedback
> > > from the list would be useful).
> > 
> > In case you haven't built the debs yet, you can try some I hacked up at
> > http://people.debian.org/~pyro/libvorbis .  They appear to work as you
> > theorized they would.
> 
> I've built them already, and it seems to work. At least it solves the
> dependency problems. Since I dont use vorbis much anyway, I haven't yet
> verified that the applications actually work with vorbis.
> 
> Thanks for your input, Brian.
-- 
Ing. Vladimir M. Kerka <kerka@dinmont.cz>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: