[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: spamc vs. razor-check ???



On February 23, 2003 07:44 am, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Replace spamc
> with spamassassin and disable spamd if you're not going to use it at
> the MTA level, it's a bit more secure that way.

However, calling spamc (a command-line client for spamd) seems to be much 
much faster than calling spamassassin.  For me calling spamassassin took 
5-10s per message, and spamc instead cut it down to a fraction of a second 
per message.

-Levi



Reply to: