Re: do i need stable in my sources.list?
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 03:03:50AM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 01:43:32AM +0000, iain d broadfoot wrote:
> > testing/unstable, do i still need the stable entries?
>
> No. testing started out as a copy of stable. The exceptions are if you
> happen to want something that's been removed from testing since the last
> stable release; even then you probably didn't want it anyway, and if you
> do you can always get it by hand.
It is very true. I did not think about it. I always listed them all.
It may be still good idea to keep following :-)
deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main
Osamu
--
~\^o^/~~~ ~\^.^/~~~ ~\^*^/~~~ ~\^_^/~~~ ~\^+^/~~~ ~\^:^/~~~ ~\^v^/~~~ +++++
Osamu Aoki <osamu@debian.org> Cupertino CA USA, GPG-key: A8061F32
.''`. Debian Reference: post-installation user's guide for non-developers
: :' : http://qref.sf.net and http://people.debian.org/~osamu
`. `' "Our Priorities are Our Users and Free Software" --- Social Contract
Reply to: