[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Big difference in antialiasing



Craig Dickson <crdic@pacbell.net> writes:

> Brian Nelson wrote:
>
>> Richard Beri <richberi@aci.on.ca> writes:
>> 
>> > Does anyone else find AA fonts annoying?  I hate them, sure they "look" 
>> > smoother, but I find that it just seems blurred and they are hard to 
>> > read.  Makes me feel something is wrong with my eyes.  It hurts.
>> 
>> Amen, brother.  I've never understood the obsession with AA fonts.  They
>> don't just seem blurry; they *are* blurry.
>
> True, but at the same time, I find AA fonts far more readable than
> non-AA fonts, since the purpose of the blur (as we all surely know) is
> to smooth out jaggies. At large sizes, the smoothing is less necessary,
> but still makes the characters look smoother, which is aesthetically
> pleasing; but at very small sizes, it can make text readable that would
> otherwise not be, due to excessive jagginess (assuming the display
> itself is sharp enough that small text doesn't just turn into mud).

I find that, for well-designed fonts, the jaggies are not an issue.

Here's a well-written rant on the subject:
http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/fog0000000041.html

-- 
My secret to happiness... is that I have a heart of a 12-year-old boy.
It's over here in a jar.  Would you like to see it?

Attachment: pgp4iP9kJna59.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: