[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: SOLVED: permissions on a mounted windows fat32 drive



On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 03:52:11AM +0100, Benedict Verheyen wrote:
> Op zo 12-01-2003, om 03:25 schreef Benedict Verheyen:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > i have a problem accessing my windows drive as a normal user.
> > My mp3 collection is stored there and i want some sound in linux :)
> > This is the relevant entry from my fstab file. The drive is fat32
> > and i want to make it accessible for my user:
> > /dev/hda5 /mnt/windata  vfat   defaults,gid=windows,umask=007  0 0
> > 
> > I want to grant every user access to the drive by making them member
> > of the group windows.
> > When i do groups benedict as benedict, it doesn't show me as member of
> > the group windows. When i issue the same command as root, it shows that
> > i'm member of the group windows.
> > Why is there this difference?
> > The group file shows me correctly that i'm member of the group.
> > 
> > However, after i mount the drive (as root) and then go back to user
> > benedict,and try to access it as benedict i get "access denied"
> > A "ls -la" reveals this:
> >  drwxrwx---   12 root windows  8192   1970-01-01 01:00  windata
> > So users of the group windows should be able to access the windata
> > partition.
> > 
> > What am i doing wrong?
> > If i set this in my fstab it works but then everything is owned by
> > benedict instead of root and that is something that i do not want
> > to allow.
> >   /dev/hda5 /mnt/windata  vfat  
> > defaults,user,uid=benedict,gid=windows,umask=007  0 0
> > 
> > Any help is appreciated.
> > Benedict
> 
> After a reboot it worked. So it was the groups thingy that prevented
> me from accessing the drive. I have no clue however to why i had to
> reboot to get the groups command reflect the correct situation.

I doubt you needed a reboot.  Groups are only dealt with at login, so
you just needed to logout then back in again for it to work.

-rob

Attachment: pgpVZFNYXfkFQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: