[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: restricting wireless access



	Does the AP have anyway to stop broadcasting it's SSID? If it
doesn't broadcast then they would have to know your SSID in order to
make use of your AP... Another idea is if you have a firewall in place
already as it seems, what are the chances of being able to put a
seperate NIC in the firewall and have the AP connect to it then you
could use iptables MAC support to allow traffic through...

	Jeremy

On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 11:56:13PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> i have a cheap-ass wireless access point which doesn't even do
> MAC-based authentication, and neither can I get WEP64 to work between
> it (Addtron AWS-110) and the Orinoco Silver card.
> 
> I would like to have wireless in my appartment, but I need to prevent
> folks on the street from linking into the network. The question is
> how. I want to prevent them from using my internet connection just as
> much as accessing local computers behind the firewall.
> 
> Is there a tools that will send TCP resets to anything coming from an
> unknown MAC address? this isn't 100% secure, but it's better than
> nothing. Or is there a tool that uses a client program to establish
> the identity of the host (like they have in some internet cafes to
> prevent you from using the cables for laptops, even if you change the
> MAC), and if someone connects without the client program, then s/he is
> TCP reset for every packet sent?
> 
> or is there a better solution? maybe someone can help me get WEP to
> work...
> 
> -- 
> Please do not CC me! Mutt (www.mutt.org) can handle this automatically.
>  
>  .''`.     martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org>
> : :'  :    proud Debian developer, admin, and user
> `. `'`
>   `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
>  
> NOTE: The pgp.net keyservers and their mirrors are broken!
> Get my key here: http://people.debian.org/~madduck/gpg/330c4a75.asc


Attachment: pgpITS55PcbUI.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: