[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Debian Woody (2.4 kernel) testing and Blackdown J2SDK 1.3.1



On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 05:00:20AM -0800, Lukas Latz wrote:
> hi all,
> 
> someone recently mentioned in a java related thread that it was
> necessary to compile libc or glibc to get Java2 to run, if i remember
> correctly.  is that the case?

No.  Sun's JDK 1.3.1 was broken when used with libc6 2.3.1 (which is now
in sid), but blackdown have released fixed versions of both 1.4 and 1.3.
It was *not* a problem with libc, it was an issue with the JDK; thus a
recompile of libc would not help.

> 
> i'm running "testing", and installed J2SDK1.3.1 from blackdown without
> any apparent problems.
> some java applications work, including, incredibly, most of the java3d
> demos, but some fail. this is what i get when i try to run Eclipse:
> 
> Exception in thread "main" java.util.zip.ZipException: No such file or
> directory	at java.util.zip.ZipFile.open(Native Method)
> 	at java.util.zip.ZipFile.<init>(ZipFile.java:110)
> 	at java.util.jar.JarFile.<init>(JarFile.java:115)
> 	at java.util.jar.JarFile.<init>(JarFile.java:57)

Not sure exactly what the problem is, but it looks like it's missing
some libraries.  The libc bug I mentioned above produced very different
output anyhow (it complained about __libc_wait).

> as J2SDK 1.3.1 seems *very* standard to me, i gotta admit i was kind of
> shocked to find out it doesn't run although the installer doesn't
> complain. actually, i had switched from "stable" to "testing" in the
> hope that would make it work.

You didn't really need to do that,

> would it help to switch to "unstable"? the machine is a purely
> development & fun machine, so i don't need maximum stability.

I doubt it.

> or is it sufficient to do that glibc recompilation? 

As in the first paragraph.

My only though is are you sure you've installed all the libraries that
eclipse needs?  It certainly looks like it wants something it can't find
up there.

-rob

Attachment: pgpS0xYbJojeF.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: