Re: Mozilla craches new libc6
Stupid me, should have searched further before bugging you guys :)
For those who are interested, I've downloaded the latest j2re from the Sun
site (j2re1.4.1_01), extracted it, removed the current
mozilla/plugins/java2 and libjavaplugin_oji.so, linked the
libjavaplugin_oji.so from the newly installed j2re and mozilla is working
again...
The problem IS the jre.xpi provided by mozilla...
With kind regards,
Marcel Lemmen
Support Net - Partner in Internetworking
--= Try http://alt.binaries.nl =--
--- The previous message was something like this: ---
!>Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 19:43:48 -0800
!>From: Marc Wilson <msw@cox.net>
!>To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
!>Subject: Re: Mozilla craches new libc6
!>Resent-Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 21:43:52 -0600 (CST)
!>Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
!>
!>I'm sure someone's probably already pointed this out, but in case they
!>haven't...
!>
!>On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 03:00:09PM +0100, Marcel Lemmen wrote:
!>> As promised my problem with newest libc6 version...
!>
!>It's not libc6...
!>
!>> java_vm: relocation error:
!>> /usr/local/mozilla/plugins/java2/lib/i386/libjava.so: symbol __libc_wait,
!>> version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference
!>> INTERNAL ERROR on Browser End: Could not read ack from browser
!>> System error?:: Resource temporarily unavailable
!>
!>Get a better Java than Sun's. Theirs is using the invalid symbol. Theirs
!>is what's causing the problem.
!>
!>> I've tried several Mozilla versions and Phoenix. The newest
!>> Java-plugin has been installed... That's not the problem...
!>
!>Oh, yes it is...
!>
!>> After I've downgraded libc6 it workes fine, unfortunately this is the only
!>> thing which is working fine... Has anyone else noticed this problem?
!>
!>That's because you've downgraded to a libc6 that has the symbol.
!>
!>--
!>Marc Wilson
!>msw@cox.net
!>
!>
!>--
!>To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
!>with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
!>
Reply to: