[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[OT] Help with cdrecord



Hi debian-users,

I'm running debian Woody.

I've burned the final track on a multi-session cdr without the -multi option
because the desired outcome was to finalise it.

The result has been that only the first recorded file is visible when I mount
the cdr like so:

bob@debian:~$ ls /cdrom/
bob2002-11-24.full.tar.bz2

The cdr was burnt with the following commands (in a script)

        #4. Add track to cdr and finalise
        rslt=$(cdrecord -msinfo dev=3,0)
        if [ -z $rslt ]
        then
                echo "Could not get multi-session information"
                cleanup
                exit 1
        fi
        mkisofs -o /tmp/cd.iso -R -C $rslt -M /dev/cdrom $fname
        cdrecord -v speed=8 dev=3,0 -eject /tmp/cd.iso

If I run `cdrecord -toc dev=3,0` I get the following:

scsibus: 0 target: 3 lun: 0
Linux sg driver version: 3.1.22
Using libscg version 'schily-0.5'
Device type    : Removable CD-ROM
Version        : 2
Response Format: 2
Capabilities   : SYNC LINKED
Vendor_info    : 'MATSHITA'
Identifikation : 'CD-R   CW-7503  '
Revision       : '1.08'
Device seems to be: Generic mmc CD-R.
Using generic SCSI-3/mmc CD-R driver (mmc_cdr).
Driver flags   : SWABAUDIO
first: 1 last 6
track:   1 lba:         0 (        0) 00:02:00 adr: 1 control: 4 mode: -1
track:   2 lba:    155034 (   620136) 34:29:09 adr: 1 control: 4 mode: 2
track:   3 lba:    163446 (   653784) 36:21:21 adr: 1 control: 4 mode: 2
track:   4 lba:    171878 (   687512) 38:13:53 adr: 1 control: 4 mode: 2
track:   5 lba:    180246 (   720984) 40:05:21 adr: 1 control: 4 mode: 2
track:   6 lba:    188406 (   753624) 41:54:06 adr: 1 control: 4 mode: 2
track:lout lba:    190760 (   763040) 42:25:35 adr: 1 control: 4 mode: -1

What should my script do instead to finalise the cdr without losing the data?

Moreover, is there some software available to retrive the data from the other
sessions on this cdr?

Thanks for your consideration,

Bob



Reply to: