On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 03:11:23PM -0600, Nathan E Norman wrote: > On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 01:38:13PM -0600, Kirk Strauser wrote: > > > > At 2002-11-18T18:12:13Z, "Gary Hennigan" <glhenni@sandia.gov> writes: > > > > > ...if security is *the* major concern in a DNS installation it's probably > > > a good idea to stay away from BIND altogether. > > > > I'd disagree for one main reason: BIND is Open Source, and tinydns is not. > > Uh, of course tinydns (sic; it's really djbdns) is open source. > Perhaps you meant to say _DFSG Free_ ? Uh, no. Open Source is pretty much equivalent to DFSG-free (APSL aside). DJB's software is not Free as in speech. It's proprietary with source available. -rob
Attachment:
pgpo8te2WSB4C.pgp
Description: PGP signature