[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: rage128 and dri (?)



This one time, at band camp, Nicos Gollan said:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On Monday 21 October 2002 20:17, Phil Reardon wrote:
> > I am trying to get XFree86 4.2 to like my rage 128 video card.   I
> > can get a grey X screen up and mouse around, but thats all.  When I
> > ctrl-alt-backspace, I see these messages on the console:  I am
> > running kernel 2.4.18 - bf2.4 on sid.
> >
> > (EE) R128(0): No DFP detected
> > (EE) R128(0): [dri] R128DRIScreenInit failed because of a version
> > mismatch. [dri]   r128.o kernel module version is 2.1.6 but version
> > 2.2 or greater is needed.
> > [dri]   Disabling the DRI
> > (EE) R128(0): [drm] failed to remove DRM signal handler
> > DRIUnlock called when not locked.
> >
> > I do not know what DFP, dri or drm refers to, but the need for
> > version 2.2 of r128.o seems clear.  How can I get that at least?
> 
> It should come along with X11, that's the place where it's being 
> maintained. If you compiled X from source, you can find the module 
> sources under
> 
> xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux
> 
> alternatively, you can get the X11 4.2 DRM modules at
> 
> http://www.xfree86.org/~alanh/
> 
> However, the DRI is only needed for 3D acceleration and X tends to run 
> fairly well without it. So getting the right kernel modules might not 
> solve any immediate problems.

There is a kernel option for DRI for X4.2, and one or DRI for older X's
(pre-4.1? I think)  bf2.4 may not have DRI for your card in it, and you
may have to recompile a kernel.  But, as noted above, X runs just fine
without DRI - you only need it for accelerated stuff.  The grey X
screen and mouse sounds like you have successfully started X, but have
specified no window manager or session manager in your ~/.xsession.
Adding 'exec <name of wm or session> to ~/.xsession may do what you
want.

Steve

-- 
Be cautious in your daily affairs.

Attachment: pgpcCWgrxuJ4V.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: