Re: SuSE vs. Debian ???
Of course, I recognize these points -- they are truly sound. I am not
of a mind to convert the customer to debian.
Rather, I am looking for pointers on learning SuSE and how to manage the
beast. Although, to some extent, linux is Linux, I have been around
enough to recognize that all apples are not red . . .
Alvin Oga wrote:
>
> hi ya
>
> "use what the customer wants"...
> - if it fails... they picked the os/hw/etc..
>
> - its also certified that oracle db9i works on suse...
> and ibm certifies their db2 works on rh-x.y
>
> - if it does works as advertised... be happy..
>
> - and lots of annoying habits that you have to relearn with yast/yast2
>
> c ya
> alvin
>
> -- my rule..
> - dont insist on something else unless you know it works 100%
> correctly under all circumstances..
> ( if you do, and it dont work.. .you're in one heap of trouble )
>
> -- there is little no difference between most distro
> ( no reason to pick one over another )
> - same kernel
> - same bash
> - same glibc
> - same apps
> - same nfs
> - same mta, httpd, loggers, sniffers, checkers,
> - same blah-blah
>
> - different installer, different logo, different "package mangers"
> - different "people"... ( end users )
> - more user apps..
>
> On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Michael D. Schleif wrote:
>
> > I must accept a project to build and manage systems to run oracle db 9i
> > and tools 11i.
> >
> > The customer is insisting that they must run SuSE
<snip />
--
Best Regards,
mds
mds resource
888.250.3987
Dare to fix things before they break . . .
Our capacity for understanding is inversely proportional to how much we
think we know. The more I know, the more I know I don't know . . .
Reply to: