Re: Whatever happened to "Unidentified Subject!"

To: Debian User <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Whatever happened to "Unidentified Subject!"
From: Nick Hastings <hastings@physics.unimelb.edu.au>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 14:59:44 +1000
Message-id: <[🔎] 20020910045943.GA9391@physics.unimelb.edu.au>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20020910034306.GA17895@earthlink.net>
References: <[🔎] 20020910020905.GD18579@ursine.dyndns.org> <[🔎] 20020910034306.GA17895@earthlink.net>

Hi,

* Mike <reznaeous@adelphia.net> [020910 14:51]:
> Paul Johnson wrote
> > Whatever happened to Unidentified Subject lines that DU used to add to
> > a blank subject line?  If they're not coming back, how do you get
> > procmail to filter against an empty subject line?
> 
> You don't.  From my .procmailrc:
> <begin snip>
> 
> :0:
> * ^X-Mailing-List.*debian-user
> debian-user

True, this works very well.

However, Baloo asks an interesting question. It would be nice to send
emails with no subject to /dev/null. Anyone got a procmail rule for
finding empty headers?

Nick

-- 
Debian testing/unstable
Linux onefish 2.4.19-lavienx #1 Mon Aug 12 20:29:59 EST 2002
i686 unknown unknown GNU/Linux

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Whatever happened to "Unidentified Subject!"
  - From: Tom Cook <tom.cook@adelaide.edu.au>

References:
- Whatever happened to "Unidentified Subject!"
  - From: Paul Johnson <baloo@ursine.dyndns.org>
- Re: Whatever happened to "Unidentified Subject!"
  - From: Mike <reznaeous@adelphia.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Why mailing-lists? Usenet have been invented, I hear. ;-)
Next by Date: Re: make-kpkg doesn't parse version correctly ?
Previous by thread: Re: Whatever happened to "Unidentified Subject!"
Next by thread: Re: Whatever happened to "Unidentified Subject!"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread