on Thu, Aug 15, 2002, John W. M. Stevens (john@betelgeuse.us) wrote: > On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 02:10:13AM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote: > > My very strong preference here is to disable most <font> antics with a > > user CSS. > > Why this, instead of simply using Mozilla's GUI? Because CSS offers far, far, far finer control. And it's the Right Tool For The Job. > > For Galeon and Mozilla, this is userContent.css in the application's > > config directory (.galeon or .mozilla, appropriate subdirectory). > > > > For more infomration: > > > > http://twiki.iwethey.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/UserContentCSS <...> > Assuming, of course, you think that the average user can figure out > CSS and write their own "user CSS" file. If you'd followed the links, you'd find that I've preempted this concern by doing same. There's a ready-to-roll CSS file at the link above. You've clearly neither read the article nor looked at the CSS file, however. > In the very first MacIntosh web browser I ever used, a user could > set their preferences via a reasonably simple set of GUI controls. Of the following? - Global body text styles (serif, non-serif, and monospace). - Global body line heights (sad that this need be corrected, but it does on some sites). - Header (H[1-2]) styles. - Link apperance -- in normal, visited, hover, and click modes. - <PRE> and related tag presentation. - Textarea presentation. - Viewsource presentation. - Nuking of embedded objects. - Selective nuking of popular advertising banner/box displays. ...all of which I configure. > So I guess the question before us is: is there a graphical configuration > tool that you know of that creates CSS files? While it's possible that a GUI tool could provide interfaces to do some or much of this, the selection of components is sufficiently complicated that this would be a very complex tool. So I've offered a preconfigured, heavily commented stylesheet, and accompanying article describing its use. > Or at the very least, is there a free, web available "how to CSS" > guide that you know of? If you're not going to read an article and stylesheet linked to, why should I post additional links to articles on "how to CSS" (which in part the linked article is, because I found the existing docs sorely lacking), for you not to read, when I've already done so in the article you haven't read? Peace. -- Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/ What Part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? Übersoft: Reliability is Overrated. http://www.ubersoft.net/
Attachment:
pgprvLLSjrvyJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature