[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Intel PRO100



Mark Zvolanek wrote:

Hello,
Thank you for your help.
I have tried modconf as suggested, below is the error that came up,

Installing module eepro100. If the device isn't there, or isn't configured
correctly, this could cause your system to pause for up to a minute.
Warning: /lib/modules/2.2.20-idepci/net/eepro100.o symbol for parameter
debug not found
/lib/modules/2.2.20-idepci/net/eepro100.o: init_module: Device or resource
busy
Hint: insmod errors can be caused by incorrect module parameters, including invalid IO or IRQ parameters /lib/modules/2.2.20-idepci/net/eepro100.o: insmod /lib/modules/2.2.20-idepci/net/eepro100.o failed
/lib/modules/2.2.20-idepci/net/eepro100.o: insmod eepro100 failed
Installation failed.

To be more specific the e100 NIC is on board. My board is Intel D845G
chipset.
The onboard NIC works fine under NT2000, and is listed as Intel (R) PRO/100 VE PCI bus 2, device 8, function 0
Memory Range 	FEAFF000 - FEAFFFFF
I/O Range		DC00 - DC3F
IRQ			20

Could anyone suggest how can I get the eepro100 module working on this
board.
Perhaps there are some optional params that I should specify when loading
the module?
I know I can specify IRQ and IO, which I tried unsuccessfully, but I am
unsure of the correct syntax for bus number or device number.

Regards
MarkZ

What's the ouput of "lsmod"? What's the output of "lspci -v"?

Possibly useful info from /usr/src/linux/Documentation/modules.txt:

For example "modinfo -a eepro100" will return:

        Maintainer: Andrey V. Savochkin <saw@saw.sw.com.sg>

and "modinfo -d eepro100" will return a description:

        Intel i82557/i82558 PCI EtherExpressPro driver

and more important "modinfo -p eepro100" will return this list:

        debug int
        options int array (min = 1, max = 8)
        full_duplex int array (min = 1, max = 8)
        congenb int
        txfifo int
        rxfifo int
        txdmacount int
        rxdmacount int
        rx_copybreak int
        max_interrupt_work int
        multicast_filter_limit int





Reply to: