[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: pppoe



I have both a ppp over modem connection to one intranet
(for security reasons) and dsl to the rest of the world
(for speed).  My route table looks like:

Kernel IP routing table
Destination     Gateway Genmask         Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
158.111.42.129  *       255.255.255.255 UH    0      0     0 ppp1
adsl-33-141-1.a *       255.255.255.255 UH    0      0     0 ppp0
192.168.118.0   *       255.255.255.0   U     0      0     0 vmnet8
192.168.0.0     *       255.255.255.0   U     0      0     0 eth0
158.111.0.0     *       255.255.0.0     U     0      0     0 ppp1
224.0.0.0       *       240.0.0.0       U     0      0     0 eth0
default         adsl-33-141-1.a 0.0.0.0 UG    0      0     0 ppp0

Note how ppp0 (dsl) has both a 255.255.255.255 mask entry and
the 0.0.0.0 mask entry (for default line).  Similarly, note how
ppp1 has both a 255.255.255.255 entry and the 255.255.0.0 entry
to route to that network.

Now the best way to rig it so it comes up automagically I'm not
sure.  I run a hand built script to pick up my ppp1 additional
route.  I also run by hand pon blat-provider for modem connection
whereas my dsl comes up with the  -on-boot script.


On Fri, 2002-07-26 at 10:39, Curtis Vaughan wrote:
> In brief, WHAT?
> 
> Are you saying that I should set up a virtual interface? e.g., ppp0:0 ?
> 
> If so, let's say the first IP address in the block is 128.12.13.137. 
> ppp0 has this address and a netmask of 255.255.255.255.
> Should I set ppp0:0 to the same IP address? Doubtful.
> I did try setting ppp0:0 to the next IP address in the block, but it 
> didn't seem to work.  I could, of course, try again.
> 
> Thanks for any additional input.
> 
> Curtis
> 
> On Friday, July 26, 2002, at 07:03 , Heitzso wrote:
> 
> > shooting from the hip ... I use pppoe and
> > I end up with 2 route entries .... one with
> > netmask 255.255.255.255 and the other rigged
> > for default that gateways through the ip setup
> > by ppp0.
> >
> > I believe, (quick rough guess) you need to leave
> > the 255.255.255.255 entry alone and rig up the
> > second route entry with the ...248 netmask.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 23:34, Curtis Vaughan wrote:
> >> Question:
> >>
> >> When making a PPPoE connection I need to have the netmask for ppp0 be
> >> 255.255.255.248
> >>
> >> Every time I connect, however, I get 255.255.255.255
> >>
> >> What do I need to do to get the netmask I need?
> >>
> >> Curtis
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
> >> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact 
> >> listmaster@lists.debian.org
> >>
> >
> 



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org



Reply to: